A federal jury in Marshall, Texas, awarded $118 million to computer memory company Netlist on Friday in a patent lawsuit against Samsung Electronics. The case centered on technology used in high-performance memory products that enhance data processing capabilities.
This decision marks the latest victory for Irvine, California-based Netlist in its legal battles over intellectual property. Last year, the company secured a $303 million verdict against Samsung in a related case. Additionally, Netlist won $445 million in May from Micron Technology in a separate lawsuit involving some of the same patents.
In the latest ruling, the jury found Samsung’s infringement to be wilful, potentially allowing the judge to increase the damages award by up to three times. Representatives from both Samsung and Netlist declined to comment on the verdict.
Netlist initiated legal action against Samsung in 2022, accusing the South Korean tech giant of infringing its patents. The disputed technology is used in memory modules designed for cloud computing servers and other data-heavy applications. According to Netlist, its patented innovations improve the power efficiency of memory modules, enabling users to process large volumes of data more effectively.
Samsung denied the allegations, arguing that Netlist’s patents were invalid and that its own technology operated differently. The company is also pursuing a separate lawsuit in Delaware federal court, accusing Netlist of failing to offer fair licenses for technology required by international standards.
The Texas ruling underscores the ongoing significance of intellectual property in the competitive tech industry, particularly in the development of memory products for data-intensive applications like artificial intelligence and cloud computing.
Legal experts note that the jury’s finding of wilful infringement could be pivotal. “A wilfulness finding is a strong statement that could significantly increase Samsung’s liability,” said a legal analyst familiar with the case.
Netlist has consistently argued that its technology is foundational to advancements in modern memory solutions. The company’s series of legal wins may strengthen its position in negotiations with other industry players and could influence the broader landscape of patent enforcement in the semiconductor sector.
As legal proceedings between the two companies continue, including Samsung’s countersuit in Delaware, the tech industry is closely watching the implications for innovation and patent licensing practices.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
LinkedIn
RSS